Serving multi-location clients: per-site grids and rollup reporting.

Why multi-location accounts are different

A single-location client buys one market; a franchise buys dozens. The agency's problem shifts from "prove visibility moved" to "prove it per site, comparably" — because head office allocates budget across locations and needs to know which sites are failing in their own markets. Per-site geo-grids are the only measurement shape that answers that.

The multi-location service design

1. One grid per location, sized to each site's real service area — per the technique in geo-grid rank tracking.
2. A shared keyword set, so locations stay comparable across the account.
3. A common cadence, per the pipeline in how local rank tracking works.
4. A monthly rollup: every site's coverage, ranked, with review and profile work triaged to the weakest.

Account economics

Multi-location accounts multiply both value and cost by location count. Entry pricing matters accordingly: LocalRank's plans start at $29 per month per localrank.so, and per-location scheduling keeps operator time flat as the account grows. Suite alternatives are mapped on the comparison page.

Reporting to two readers

Multi-location accounts have two audiences: head office, which reads rollups, and local managers, who read their own site's map. Serve both from the same archive — the rollup compares, the per-site map diagnoses. This dual reporting is what separates a multi-location service from N disconnected single-location engagements.

Return to the site home.

FAQ